At 1835 hrs this date (know what time that converts to Albero?) it was posted on “The Watch desk” that Chief See had initiated a policy change relating to volunteer obligations and response. At 1955 hrs, a mere 1 hour and 20 minutes later, Albero has deemed this major breaking news.
Granted, as of yet Albero has passed no opinion on the subject but again in typical Albero fashion he has taken one side of the story and run with it. Did he attend the meeting when this policy change was presented? Has he interviewed Chief See to determine the validity of the post? Has he confirmed any thing from anyone except what he has read from another site?
I am certainly not taking sides on this issue myself. I am simply stating that Albero has not provided anything that can be considered as newsworthy or credible at this point. Something he accuses The Daily Times of constantly.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
8 comments:
Joe A. you are a loser. You need to grow up. You act like a baby sometimes. I bet you pat yourself on the back because you think you are a internet king pen. You are a joke.
You post something off the watchdesk without checking ot out. But we all know you have a mole in the SFD, and we all know who that is. That guy has no back bone and is a legend in is own mind also. That's why you two belong together.
When is the last time you post actual news on your site without taking a cheap shot to the heads of Salisbury. You cant answer that one!
People see you ans say... Oh christ here come that ass off of the internet.
bahahahahahahahahahah WBarrall...you are GREAT!!!l
Great Posts All of You!
caughtit.......
What are you trying to say?
He's cool fun guy.
I'm OK with the coment
If sbynews.com is supposedly "unbiased", then how come Runaround Sue refers to it as his "cause"?
Hmmm.
BTW-- Still waiting to get served.
Post a Comment